<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese Auto Safety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hiwhy.com/2008/12/09/chinese-auto-safety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hiwhy.com/2008/12/09/chinese-auto-safety/</link>
	<description>Focuses on Education, Business, Law and Other Topics Relevant to Chinese Americans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:24:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Law</title>
		<link>http://www.hiwhy.com/2008/12/09/chinese-auto-safety/comment-page-1/#comment-10682</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hiwhy.com/?p=633#comment-10682</guid>
		<description>I suppose if you hadn&#039;t been paying too much attention to the reality of automotive safety for the last decade you&#039;d say that Volvo was &quot;synonymous with product safety.&quot; But if you&#039;d followed Volvo closely since its takeover by Ford you would know that the Swedish firm&#039;s attention to safety had waned, for financial reasons. Volvo has not proceeded with at least one safety system it used to say was essential -- automatic crash response similar to what GM has with OnStar -- because Ford had to stick to &quot;essentials&quot; during its last financial crisis. The safety ship sailed from Goteborg about five years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose if you hadn&#8217;t been paying too much attention to the reality of automotive safety for the last decade you&#8217;d say that Volvo was &#8220;synonymous with product safety.&#8221; But if you&#8217;d followed Volvo closely since its takeover by Ford you would know that the Swedish firm&#8217;s attention to safety had waned, for financial reasons. Volvo has not proceeded with at least one safety system it used to say was essential &#8212; automatic crash response similar to what GM has with OnStar &#8212; because Ford had to stick to &#8220;essentials&#8221; during its last financial crisis. The safety ship sailed from Goteborg about five years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.hiwhy.com @ 2012-02-08 17:09:13 -->
